Monday, August 1, 2011
Joseph J. Honick
Read More Joe Hoenick
Is that not how we might characterize what has been going on with whatever you call it between the warring parties in Washington?
Perhaps that idea of using “head hunters” to find good candidates for the White House might also be extended to both Houses of the United States Congress.
Think of the savings in campaign fund raising, printing of ballots and all the rest of the absurd stuff that seems to inundate political campaigns.
Of course one would have to contend with the rest of the absurdity that would go with such moves. For example, there would be the folding of political campaign consultant offices; it would be tougher for broadcast and print pundits to “ pundit”, and there would be the massive job dislocation that could result from the PR firm and other media hangers on.
Despite the absurdity of this kind of proposal, would it be any more preposterous than what we have?
The fact is it is more difficult just to be considered for the Board of Directors of the American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) than to qualify for Congress and the Presidency where the minimal requirements deal pretty much age minimums, residency and similar easy stuff.
To apply just to be considered for the AARP Board of Directors, there are questions as to race or ethnicity, age range and agreement to stand for intensive investigations. That is just to be qualified for presentation to the membership. Asked about those requests, the office of the AARP Corporate Secretary told me “if the committee were to present a homogeneous slate of candidates-of similar ages, ethnicity and gender – they risk having the slate rejected by the Board and having to start the nominations process over again.”
The anonymous writer of the Corporate Secretary Office asserted further: “The AARP Board oversees a budget in excess of a billion dollars and a workforce of some 2,000 individuals across the United States. Each finalist candidate for the Board is asked to consent to a background check conducted by an executive research firm retained by AARP, to include criminal, background and reference checks as well as public records checks……The screening has resulted in elimination of potential candidates, based on adverse information found in the background check,”
Given the size of our multi-trillion dollar budget and much larger employment, perhaps our own Constitution needs some review to make it just as tough even to be considered for national leadership,
Joseph J. Honick is an international consultant to business and government and writes for many publications, He can be reached at email@example.com
© Joseph J. Honick